# Has Jami considered supporting QUIC

**URL:** <https://forum.jami.net/t/has-jami-considered-supporting-quic/5566>\
**Category:** Product requests and ideas\
**Created:** [April 5, 2026, 12:58pm UTC](https://forum.jami.net/t/has-jami-considered-supporting-quic/5566 "2026-04-05T12:58:08Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hkk](https://forum.jami.net/user_avatar/forum.jami.net/hkk/32/592_2.png) [@hkk](https://forum.jami.net/u/hkk)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2026, 12:58pm UTC](https://forum.jami.net/t/has-jami-considered-supporting-quic/5566/1 "2026-04-05T12:58:09Z")

</div>

Quic seems to be a very good protocol, especially in end-to-end applications, where Quic seems to have significant advantages. Is Jami considering supporting Quic?