Jami as a self hosted solution to improve reliability?

[Sino]

It could be an idea to have to have a version or an option to set a self hosting to use Jami not completely p2p way?
I was thinking in something like xmpp to improve in reliability and speed of the connections specially on mobile devices.

[ECaptainRaj]

Jami actually uses a few servers … but you can use your own:

Own_server (migrate)

If you create a username it is stored on ns.jami.net. Link: https://git.jami.net/savoirfairelinux/jami-project/-/wikis/tutorials/Frequently-Asked-Questions#account-8 By default, a username is registered on ns.jami.net where you can’t modify the Jami ID associated to this username. So, if you delete or if you lost your account you will not be able to retrieve this username, ever. Nobody will be able to recreate an account with the same username. Actually you can have 5 (different) servers: …

[Sino]

Yes. Thank you @ECaptainRaj . I know. What I mean if we can have an option to have a hosted version of Jami that get the messages for us and serve to the client to avoid the problems of DHT.

[ECaptainRaj]

I think things might change as soon as Jami web will be released?