I am very sorry to bring up such a meta-discussion. Some time ago I have spent my time to write two rather detailed posts to express my view on this project and suggest possible ways of improvement. Sadly, both of them were marked as spam. I believe, that most disputes are caused by differences in how both parties understand the rules.
I suppose, that it happened because I mentioned some software. In one case it was to demonstrate a good implementation of a certain feature, which can be replicated in Jami, in other - to suggest a possible additional transport for calls. I thought that it was normal to do so, but maybe here it is considered to be wrong.
I have read the community guidelines and saw, that there is no strict description of what is considered to be a spam and what is not. I humbly ask admins and the community to be more specific on this matter, because such uncertainty hinders healthy conversation.
I also edited my posts to remove mentioning of other software. The system notification I received promised, that after editing that posts they will be automatically unhidden - at least until someone flag them again. But they were not unhidden even for a moment. This may be a bug in this forum’s software.